Skills-based hiring, in the Recruitee you already run.
Nothing to migrate. Agents read your Recruitee, understand what every candidate can actually do, and write shortlists and matches back, with the evidence attached.
RecruiteeYour Recruitee knows names, not skills.
The candidate database isn't skills-searchable: filtering stops at the basics.
Everyone who ever applied is invisible to the vacancy you opened today. That's your best sourcing channel, dark.
Your per-vacancy email automations work; you shouldn't have to give them up to get intelligence.
DIY first, honestly: you can export candidates and ask an AI about them: it works once, for one vacancy, until the export goes stale. The difference is having it live inside Recruitee, on every vacancy, every day.
Start with one decision →The playbook way
Every candidate, new and historic, matched on skills against the vacancy, not on keywords.
The shortlist lands back in Recruitee, ranked, with the why per name. Your automations keep running.
Evidence on every name: “show me why” is a click.
No automated decisions: your recruiters keep every call.
Your data stays yours: exportable, always.
Straight answers.
No. Recruitee stays your ATS; the intelligence arrives inside it.
Candidates and stage moves, both directions: we write shortlists and moves back into your flow.
Yes. Habits that work are preserved, not replaced.
That's the point: your whole historic base becomes skills-searchable for every new vacancy.
Also for: Greenhouse · Personio. Or see the skills-based hiring playbook · how the skills engine works · all integrations.
