Skip to content
Everday

PlaybooksAI readiness

AI readiness, demonstrated, not claimed.

How AI-ready are your people, actually? Three dimensions, at the depth each role needs: use, work with, or build with AI. Measured on what people demonstrate, landing in the systems you already run.

It starts when… a new person joins

Playbook · installed

The AI readiness playbook

How AI-ready your people actually are: measured on what they demonstrate, at the depth each role needs, landing where you already work.

The programs2 programs · 2 agents
It starts when
a new person joinsa quarter closes
The crew
Skills
Instrument scoringConsent captureEvidence extraction
Rules

People see their own results first: consent attached, always.

It starts when
results land
The crew
Skills
Skills matchingGap mappingWrite to your HRIS· asks you first
Rules

A readiness score informs a human decision: it never makes one.

The surfaces2 sites · your brand
Readiness radar: three dimensions, per person
Team view: readiness as a trend
It lands inyour stack
your HRISyour ATS

One pass. Everything above, working.Nothing you didn't see.

Start AI readiness

Your problem, solved.

“We need to know how AI-ready our people actually are.”

A hunch about adoptiona measured baseline.

Three dimensions on everyone (AI literacy and skills, behavioral adoption, calibrated trust) at the depth each role needs: use, work with, or build with AI.

Self-report surveys: everyone rates themselves a four out of five, and nobody trusts the average.

Claimed skillsdemonstrated ones.

Real scenarios and knowledge items, scored consistently against an expert key. You can inflate a self-rating, not a demonstrated score, and the gap between the two is itself a signal.

The AI budget is committed; where the workforce actually stands is a guess.

A one-time scorereadiness as a trend.

Re-run on your cadence: growth visible, regression caught as the models move: a baseline that becomes progress you can act on.

What it is, how it lands.

Measured on what people demonstrate, never self-report.

Three dimensions, at the depth each role needs.

Use AI → work with AI → build with AI.

People see their own results first, consent attached: development is proposed, never assigned.

Scope it in one conversation

Bring the question: an adoption program, an AI hiring bar, a board ask. We define what AI-ready means for your organisation, and you leave with the plan.

Live in weeks, in your systems

Triggered from the ATS or HRIS you already run; results land back where you work. Nothing new to adopt.

Then it runs

Re-measures on your cadence; readiness becomes a trend your people see first and your team can steer on. We operate, monitor and improve it.

asks you
the whole story · 23 seconds
runs insidePersonioHiBobBambooHR

The value you get back.

A baseline you can steer on

Where the workforce actually stands, per role and per team. The picture the adoption program and the L&D budget were missing.

A hiring bar for the AI era

A readiness signal on candidates, at the depth the role needs: a soft gate first, a hard one once the numbers prove out.

Growth you can prove

Re-measured on your cadence: development that moved the needle, visible, and regression caught as the models move.

Straight answers.

Who is this for?

Companies taking AI adoption seriously: a rollout that stalled on people, an AI bar for hiring, or a board asking where the workforce actually stands.

Is this an assessment tool?

The instrument is one evidence source inside a decision we help you run: we define what AI-ready means for your organisation, measure it, and land the results where decisions happen. They sell the test; we run the decision.

Can people game it?

You can inflate a self-rating, not a demonstrated score. Skills are measured on real scenarios, scored the same way every time, and the claimed-versus-demonstrated gap is itself a signal.

How does this sit with the EU AI Act?

No automated decision-making, ever: a readiness score informs a human decision, never makes one. People see their own results first, consent attached, and every result is traceable.

What does it cost?

An upfront delivery fee sized to the solution, plus a monthly platform fee on the connected population. The upfront pays for the definition work (what AI-ready means for you), which is the product, not an overhead.

Grounded in published AI-literacy, technology-adoption and human–AI-trust research: scored on what people demonstrate, never on what they claim.

The shape.

Scoped in one conversation. Installed and tuned on your real cases in weeks. Then it runs: we do the legwork, you approve what matters, and when your process changes the playbook changes with it. Upfront delivery fee + monthly platform fee, sized to the solution, never to your headcount.

This playbook, in your tools: AI readiness in your HRIS · AI readiness in Workday · AI readiness in SAP.