Conversations people actually finish.
Surveys get ignored; forms get abandoned. Pulse asks like a person would: short, contextual, in the flow of work. What it learns lands in Memory with source and consent attached.
three questions · two minutes · sample conversation
What it feels like.
A conversation, in plain language, that opens with who’s asking and why: “We’re mapping skills for internal opportunities, three questions, two minutes.” You answer in your own words. It follows up once, politely, and then it stops.
That’s the whole experience.
What teams run on Pulse.
Where your organisation actually stands, asked person by person, not inferred from one all-staff survey.
Validated instruments, delivered as a conversation people finish, scored by the psychometrics engine, never by AI.
Short, regular, honest, and the answers visibly go somewhere.
Week one, month one: the questions that catch problems while they’re still small.
The skills passport built through dialogue, not a 200-row self-assessment form.
every answer lands in Memory, with source and consent attached
Working for the person who answers.
Answers become skills evidence, preferences and mobility signals in Memory, with provenance. And they work for the person who gave them: better matches, visible growth, a skills record that’s theirs.
Pulse is not monitoring, not sentiment-mining, not a surveillance tool wearing a friendly face.
the consent line is in the product, not the fine print
Consent, visibly.
- 01People know what’s collected and why.
- 02Nothing goes to a decision without a human.
The full boundaries story (retention, deletion, who sees what) lives on the trust page.
